Birmingham Personal Injury Lawyers - Belt Law Firm, P.C. Alabama Auto Accidents Attorneys - Belt Law Firm, P.C.
Birmingham Injury Attorneys / Alabama Accident Lawyers

Verdicts & Settlements

Quick Contact
Name:
Phone:
Email:
How did you hear about us?
Comment/Questions:

Notable Jury Verdicts

The trial lawyers of Belt Law Firm have the experience, resources and dedication to work up any case and take it to trial. The following are notable jury verdicts in cases prosecuted by the firm's attorneys.

Vu Ho v. John DeGroat Jefferson County (Bessemer Division), $6,000,000
(Automobile Accidents)

Mayor Maude Hobbs v. Dixie Oil: Sumter County, $5,000,000
(Environmental Contamination / undergound storage tank litigation)

Dulin Energy et al. v. Moss Levin Joint Venture et al: Walker County, $4,500,000
(Commercial Litigation case involving strip mining coal contract)

Fred Lloyd v. Gray Brown: Calhoun County, $2,000,000
(Personal Injury / Outrage mishandling of dead body)

Richard Johnson v. Norfolk Southern: Greene County, $750,000
(Personal Injury Railroad crossing accident)

Ricky Steading v. Keibler Thomson: Jefferson County (Bessemer Division), $500,000
(Construction or Industrial Workplace Accident)

Dippery et al. v. Amoco et al: New Mexico Federal Court, $500,000
(Environmental Contamination leaking oil and gas wells that contaminated residential ground water)

Cleckler v. Scaffolds by Web tex, Jefferson County, $250,000
(Products Liability)

Spivey v. Crenshaw Baptist Hospital, Crenshaw County, $125,000
(Medical Malpractice)

These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.